Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+70%
462
Quadro 410
271
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
38W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
