Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs L40 CNX

Quadro M2000 vs L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (2475MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
L40 CNX +4937%
89970
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
768
Shading Units
18176
48
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
AD102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy