Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs RTX A2000

Quadro M2000 vs RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1200MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A2000 +347%
7987
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
26
768
Shading Units
3328
48
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA106
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
12 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy