Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170

Quadro M2000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (2050MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +840%
16790
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
DG2-512
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy