Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K600

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +431%
1786
Quadro K600
336
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy