Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs RTX A2000 Mobile

Quadro M2000 vs RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1358MHz vs 1163MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A2000 Mobile +289%
6953
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
RTX A2000 Mobile +742%
1222
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
RTX A2000 Mobile +200%
84
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA106
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
12 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy