Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K6000

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1163MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro K6000 +190%
5196
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro K6000 +192%
82
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
2880
48
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK110B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy