Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K620M

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1163MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +106%
1786
Quadro K620M
863
Blender
Quadro M2000 +76%
145
Quadro K620M
82
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000 +55%
28
Quadro K620M
18
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GM108
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy