Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Quadro M2000 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1600MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +2835%
52430
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
16384
48
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
2400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
100 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy