Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1560MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +705%
14380
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
768
Shading Units
4608
48
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
TU102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy