Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro M5000M

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro M5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro M5000M +67%
2995
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro M5000M +89%
275
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro M5000M +117%
61
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GM204
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy