Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI25

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1500MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Radeon Instinct MI25 +588%
12290
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Vega 10
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy