Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI250X

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1700MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Radeon Instinct MI250X +2580%
47870
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
768
Shading Units
14080
48
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy