Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs RTX A500 Mobile

Quadro M2000 vs RTX A500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1537MHz vs 1163MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A500 Mobile +252%
6296
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
RTX A500 Mobile +297%
576
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
RTX A500 Mobile +146%
69
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.78 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA107S
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy