Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+2066%
16310
Quadro K3000M
753
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 8000
+2644%
13586
Quadro K3000M
495
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
576
288
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
