Radeon R7 250 OEM vs B200 SXM 192 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 1000W)
B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1837MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.10TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
16512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
806
B200 SXM 192 GB
+7602%
62080
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
384
Shading Units
16896
24
TMUs
528
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GB100
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
104 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
10.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A