Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+7066%
5733
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
1
2816
Shading Units
80
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
M93
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
