Radeon R9 295X2 vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV380
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
-
