Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+14845%
2989
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
20
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
8
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
G98
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
