Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+438%
3723
FirePro W4190M
691
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Opal
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.3
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
