Home Comparison Radeon X1650 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

Radeon X1650 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

400 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
RV630
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net