Radeon X1650 GT vs FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
RV620
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
4.1
