Tesla C2075 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+222%
3318
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU117
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
