Tesla C2075 vs Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
6208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Radeon Instinct MI210
+2101%
22630
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
6656
56
TMUs
416
48
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
