Home Comparison Xeon 6756E vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Xeon 6756E vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon 6756E with 128 cores 1.8GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon 6756E 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Lower TDP (225W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 96MB)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2024
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sierra Forest
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4710
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon 6(Sierra Forest-SP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
225 W
Power Consumption
360 W
96°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
10 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
128
Total Core Count
96
128
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18.0
Multiplier
24.0
96 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
4 MB per module
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
96 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
2
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
1 TB
Max Memory Size
-
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
5
88
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy