Home Comparison Xeon W 1390 vs AMD EPYC 7F32

Xeon W 1390 vs AMD EPYC 7F32

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon W 1390 with 8 cores 2.8GHz and AMD EPYC 7F32 with 8 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon W 1390 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 180W)
AMD EPYC 7F32 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
Xeon W 1390 +93%
1759
AMD EPYC 7F32
910
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Xeon W 1390 +332%
10301
AMD EPYC 7F32
2382
VS

General Parameters

May 2021
Release Date
Apr 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Rocket Lake-S
Core Architecture
Rome
Intel Socket 1200
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
UHD Graphics P750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Rocket Lake-S)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))

Package

-
Transistor Count
3.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
80 W
Power Consumption
180 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
276 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

CPU Performance

2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
8
Total Core Count
8
16
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
28.0
Multiplier
37.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
4
20
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy