Home Comparison Xeon W 1390 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9124

Xeon W 1390 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9124

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon W 1390 with 8 cores 2.8GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 with 16 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon W 1390 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 200W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Rocket Lake-S
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 1200
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
UHD Graphics P750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Rocket Lake-S)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
26.28 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
80 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
276 mm²
Die Size
4x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
16
16
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
28.0
Multiplier
30.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy