Home Comparison Xeon X3460 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

Xeon X3460 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon X3460 with 4 cores 2.8GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon X3460 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1333)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 45nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Lynnfield
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 1156
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon(Lynnfield)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

0.774 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
45 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
360 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
296 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.467 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
133 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3-1333
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

2
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy