NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1480MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+118%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
+129%
2973
Quadro P620
1294
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
+279%
1350
Quadro P620
356
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
