Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +19586%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Oct 2008
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
4
6912
Shading Units
32
432
TMUs
16
160
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy