Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +3668%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
30
7168
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
189W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy