Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1770MHz vs 1635MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +43%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
72
7168
Shading Units
4608
224
TMUs
288
80
ROPs
96
224
Tensor Cores
576
56
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy