Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1750MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +61%
4.339 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Blender
A16 PCIe +29%
510
Arc A310
393
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Tesla
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
40
Tensor Cores
96
10
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy