Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc A750

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2400MHz vs 1695MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +296%
17.2 TFLOPS
Blender
A16 PCIe
510
Arc A750 +331%
2200
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Tesla
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
112
40
Tensor Cores
448
10
RT Cores
28
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy