Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +4239%
4.339 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy