Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2320MHz vs 1695MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +310%
17.82 TFLOPS
Blender
A16 PCIe
510
Radeon Pro W6800 +288%
1980
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
2075 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
60
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
26.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy