Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A30 PCIe +97%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2015
Tesla Ampere
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
512bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2816
224
TMUs
176
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy