Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
18816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +19033%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
640
880
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
65W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy