Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V420 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon Pro V420 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM AMD Radeon Pro V420 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V420 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Radeon Pro V420 +2237%
13.93 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
819.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
435.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
27.85 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
6.963 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
289W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy