Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 30W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV380
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
