Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 30W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV380
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy