Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +22%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2016
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
265W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tonga
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy