Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro V3800

Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro V3800

Intel Arc A310
VS
ATI FirePro V3800
Intel Arc A310
ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +416%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Redwood
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy