Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

Intel Arc A310 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1750MHz vs 1725MHz)

Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A310

2.688 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +64%

4.416 TFLOPS

Blender

Arc A310

393

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +48%

583

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A310

7

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +171%

19

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A310

20

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +100%

40

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A310

30

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +113%

64

Arc A310

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Nov 2019

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz

Base Clock

1530 MHz

1750 MHz

Boost Clock

1725 MHz

1937 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

124.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

20

-

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

1280

32

TMUs

80

16

ROPs

32

96

Tensor Cores

-

6

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.20 GPixel/s

56.00 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

138.0 GTexel/s

5.376 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.832 TFLOPS

2.688 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.416 TFLOPS

672.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128

GPU Name

TU116

ACM-G11

GPU Variant

TU116-250-KA-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

7.2 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

157 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

30W

TDP

100W

200 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A310 vs Intel Arc A380

2

Intel Arc A310 vs Intel UHD Graphics 730

3

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX 550

4

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

5

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA T1000

6

Intel Arc A310 vs Intel Arc A350

7

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe

8

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

9

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

10

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD