Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1750MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +47%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc A310 +165%
475
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GM206
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy