Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

Intel Arc A310 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +296%
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net