Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA P102 100

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1750MHz vs 1683MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
P102 100 +300%
10.77 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc A310
393
P102 100 +114%
844
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Alchemist
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
25
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
3200
32
TMUs
200
16
ROPs
80
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GP102
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy