Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FirePro V7800

Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +52%
3.072 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1440
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy