Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +2972%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2011
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF119
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy