Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +1534%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
72
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy