Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs Intel H3C XG310

Intel Arc A350 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2000MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +29%
3.072 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
24
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
DG1
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy